Sociopaths and the Fake Impossible
I. The Lie of the Fake Impossible
The fake impossible is not a limit—it is a lie dressed in the language of mercy.
There are things in life that are truly impossible. Immortality. Flawlessness. Absolute knowledge. These belong to the realm of the divine. They are beyond the reach of man, and no honest person would claim otherwise. But there is another kind of impossibility—one that is manufactured. It is crafted not out of limitation, but out of malice. It is the “fake impossible,” and it is the preferred weapon of pathetic sociopaths.
The fake impossible masquerades as humility. It borrows the language of acceptance and self-love, but only to cover a deeper rot. It does not say, “I am flawed but striving.” It says, “Because I can never be perfect, I will not even try.” This is not vulnerability. This is the willful surrender of virtue. It is a preemptive retreat, made to look like wisdom.
There is a difference between being wounded and being wicked. The wounded fall and cry out for help. The wicked fall and then declare gravity a moral illusion. They wish not for healing, but for the abolition of health. And when they speak, they do so with the smugness of someone who has found a loophole in the moral law.
I have seen this lie take root in individuals, then institutions, then entire cultures. And each time, it arrives with the same excuse: “Perfection is impossible.” That much is true. But it was never the point. The point was always to aim higher than the self. The fake impossible exists to make sure no one does.
II. The Scumbag’s Bargain
He calls himself broken so no one will ask him to be whole.
The sociopath does not rage against virtue. He mimics it. He rewrites it. He plays dress-up with its words until the meaning is lost. This is how the scumbag enters the temple: not with fire and destruction, but with a smirk and a shrug. “Nobody’s perfect,” he says, as though that settles everything. As though the admission of imperfection relieves him of the burden to change.
He offers the world a bargain: in exchange for absolute non-judgment, he will admit that he is technically flawed. He will call himself broken. He will say the words “I am not perfect.” But what he really means is, “Do not expect anything from me.” He weaponizes the language of grace to sanctify his filth. And when you challenge him, he accuses you of cruelty. He makes his shamelessness into a shield.
There is a profound difference between failing and refusing to strive. The former requires mercy. The latter deserves none. Yet we live in a time that blurs the line so thoroughly that even cruelty looks like self-care. The sociopath plays the victim before the trial even begins. He begs for pardon, not because he is sorry, but because he has never believed in guilt to begin with.
This is not self-awareness. It is a con. The sociopath does not seek forgiveness. He seeks permission. And if he cannot obtain it honestly, he will manipulate you into giving it anyway.
III. Decency Is Not Perfection
Fake humility defends weakness not to heal it, but to enthrone it.
Perfection is not the standard. It never has been. The command was always to be holy, not flawless—to be upright, not unbreakable. Decency does not require that a man never falter. It requires that he rise when he does. That he blush at dishonor. That he feel the sting of shame and let it shape him.
But we have allowed the sociopath to redraw the lines. Now, to suggest that a man should behave decently is treated as puritanical. To expect anything more than base indulgence is viewed as oppressive. Even the idea of striving is met with suspicion. The coward has declared that effort is tyranny.
Fake humility is the root of this disease. It is the voice that says, “Who am I to judge?” while judging anyone who expects standards. It is the voice that says, “We all fall short,” but never bothers to get back up. It wears the mask of meekness, but behind it is a deep contempt—for beauty, for discipline, for anyone who dares to aim higher.
Real humility acknowledges limits. False humility denies responsibility. One creates reverence. The other creates rot.
The truth is that decency is attainable. Dignity is within reach. Self-control is possible. These are not the domains of saints or sages. They are the daily duties of men. And they are evaded not because they are beyond us, but because they demand something of us.
IV. The Fat Woman and the Model
The standard must be destroyed, not because it cannot be met, but because it proves they never tried.
She stands on the stage, microphone in hand, thunder in her voice. She declares that beauty standards are oppressive, that thinness is a tool of patriarchy, that striving for health is internalized hatred. The crowd roars in agreement, not because they are persuaded, but because they are relieved. Relieved to be told that their failures are sacred.
Her argument is simple: since she cannot look like a supermodel, she should not bother reaching a healthy weight. The goal is too high, therefore all goals must be abolished. Her refusal to try is treated as empowerment. Her rebellion against reality is repackaged as courage.
But this is not confidence. This is nihilism. This is a refusal to distinguish between the impossible and the worthy. The model body may be beyond reach for most. But the healthy body is not. Yet in her world, to aim for the latter is no different than idolizing the former. Any standard is an enemy. Any improvement is betrayal.
This lie has spread. It infects more than bodies. It poisons minds and morals. The man who cannot be a genius declares that reading is elitist. The woman who cannot be pure declares that chastity is repressive. Everyone declares war on the ideal, because the ideal exposes what they lack the will to become.
And so, mediocrity is crowned. Not by accident, but by force. By decree. Because as long as the good is visible, the wicked cannot relax.
V. The Coward’s Gospel
The coward’s gospel replaces repentance with affirmation and calls it grace.
It was not long before this lie found its way into churches, schools, and families. Once the sociopath discovered the power of the fake impossible, he offered it to the masses. And they accepted. They welcomed the new gospel: You are enough. You are perfect as you are. You do not need to change. You must never feel shame.
The coward’s gospel tells people that holiness is toxic, that obedience is abuse, that guilt is trauma. It teaches children that rules are violence. It teaches adults that discipline is bigotry. It tells the addict that sobriety is optional. It tells the liar that truth is subjective.
This is not compassion. It is surrender. It is the institutionalization of failure. No longer are we called to rise. We are told to sit and make peace with the mud. And if anyone dares to stand, to strive, to reach—they are mocked. They are accused of arrogance. They are made the enemy.
The coward’s gospel demands only one thing: that no one improve. That no one ascend. That no one shine so brightly that the darkness is revealed.
And it works. The standards are lowered. The bar is removed entirely. And in its place, we are given applause. Participation trophies. Therapy language used to justify decay. No longer does virtue inspire. It threatens. And the institutions built to protect the good now protect the coward instead.
VI. The Return to Aspiration
Better to fail reaching upward than to rot in peace below.
But I will not live like this. I will not pretend that because I cannot reach the summit, I should dwell in the pit. There is honor in the climb, even if the peak is unseen. There is dignity in striving, even if perfection is forever out of reach.
The world needs the return of aspiration. Not the hollow ambitions of narcissists, but the sacred pursuit of something higher than the self. A man should aim to be disciplined, even if he stumbles. A woman should aim to be virtuous, even if she weeps along the way. This is what separates the noble from the base—not that they succeed, but that they refuse to stop moving toward the light.
Let the sociopath mock. Let the coward sneer. I would rather be hated for trying than celebrated for rotting.
There is no salvation in the fake impossible. Only chains. It tells us we are incapable, and then dares us to prove it true. But I have seen what happens when men reject the lie. I have seen them rebuild strength, reclaim honor, rediscover meaning. They fall, yes—but they fall forward.
The fake impossible destroys not by failing, but by convincing others never to try. And so the answer is not to redefine virtue. It is to pursue it with eyes wide open and hands willing to bleed.
Better to fail with fire in the soul than to live comfortably in the cold.


WHAT AN EXCELLENT ARTICLE.
What you point out here reminds me of a TV mini-series I discovered a few years ago which stood out to me so much because it repeatedly foiled the viewers' expectations (reinforced by news, media, movies, and TV) that badness and evil must exist around every corner.
My relatively short post about this is here for anyone interested:
"The Best Thing About The Queen's Gambit"
https://theunexpectedworld.substack.com/p/the-best-thing-about-the-queens-gambit